Electronic Arts Need to Go Out if Business for Their Shady Loot Box Scams

Overview of criticism related to Electronic Arts Inc.

Since the 2010s, the video game visitor Electronic Arts has been at the center of numerous controversies involving acquisitions of companies and anti-consumer practices in their private games, equally well as lawsuits alleging anti-competitive practices on EA's part when signing sports-related contracts. In 2012 and 2013, the company was named "Worst Visitor in America" past Consumerist, while it was named the 5th most hated company in the United States by United states of america Today in 2018.[ane]

Studio acquisitions and closures [edit]

During the early 2000s, when EA was in a period of fast growth, the company adult a reputation of acquiring evolution studios, primarily for their intellectual holding (IP) avails rather than the studios' talent, and and then subsequently forcing changes on the studios' piece of work product that impacted the quality or telescopic of the game, and/or determining the studios were no longer necessary due to the poor performances of their games and dissolving them.[i] This created an appearance that EA was handling games as if it were an associates line, only looking to put out as much product as possible without care for the content or the creative staff that were behind the cosmos of the games.[2] The company gained the derogatory nickname equally the "Evil Empire" within the video game manufacture as a consequence of these business practices.[1]

EA'south handling of Origin Systems, the studio backside the Ultima serial, is considered a key example of this business practice. EA caused Origin in 1992. Under EA, Origin was pushed into quickly finishing 2 Ultima titles, Ultima 8: Pagan and Ultima Ix: Ascension, despite protests from the studio's founder Richard Garriott.[3] Both titles were poorly received compared to the previous entries in the series.[four] Between these, Origin had also developed Ultima Online which had been successful. Following evolution of Ultima IX, the studio had started work on Ultima Online 2, but due to the poor sales of Ultima IX, EA cancelled that work, leaving Origin primarily to support Ultima Online until EA decided to shutter the studio in 2004, moving the remaining staff to other divisions inside EA.[v] Other studios considered to have been afflicted by EA's handling include Bullfrog Productions, Westwood Studios, Maxis, and Pandemic Studios.[5] [6]

Past 2008, EA had started altering its practices, in function due to the appointment of a new CEO, John Riccitiello. Riccitiello best-selling in 2008 that the company'due south prior practices towards acquisition was wrong and that the company now gave acquired studios greater autonomy without "meddling" in their corporate culture.[seven] The company's CFO Blake Jorgensen similarly acknowledged this prior practice was "somewhat marginal in performance" in a statement in 2014, and that going forrad, the company would probable slow down on acquisitions and giving the opportunity for their internal studios to assistance produce major titles instead.[8] This sentiment was echoed past those that had worked in EA in the by and present. In 2008, John D. Carmack of id Software, in announcing that EA would publish their upcoming title Rage, said that EA was no longer the "Evil Empire":[ix] Carmack said "I'll acknowledge that, if you asked me years ago, I still had thoughts that EA was the Evil Empire, the visitor that crushes the small studios... I'd accept been surprised, if you told me a twelvemonth ago that we'd end upwards with EA as a publisher. When we went out and talked to people, specially EA Partners people similar Valve, we got almost uniformly positive responses from them."[9] Peter Molyneux, who had founded Bullfrog, also said that EA was not an "Evil Empire" in an interview in 2014, but acknowledged that when studios are acquired by the likes of EA, the added funds and boosted support, such as larger offices, "changes the season of the visitor" and tin atomic number 82 to events that tin can lead to poor operation from the studio.[10]

While the company's reputation in managing studios had improved since 2008, EA'due south closure of Visceral Games in 2017 was considered by Engadget as a return to EA's "bad habit of shuttering well-known studios".[11]

EA was once criticized for the conquering of 19.9 percent of shares of its competitor Ubisoft, a movement that Ubisoft'due south then spokesperson initially described equally a "hostile human action".[12] However, Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot later on indicated that a merger with EA was a possibility, stating, "The first selection for us is to manage our ain visitor and grow information technology. The second pick is to piece of work with the movie industry, and the 3rd is to merge."[xiii] Yet, in July 2010, EA elected to sell its reduced 15 percent share in Ubisoft.[fourteen] That share equated to roughly €94 meg (United states of america$122 million).[15]

Treatment of employees [edit]

In the video game industry, it is not uncommon for publishers and developers to have employees work extra hours almost the last few weeks or months of the development cycle to brand sure a game is released on time, ofttimes unpaid as such workers are classified every bit exempt from overtime pay; this is commonly known equally "crunch time".[16] In 2004, Electronic Arts was criticized for employees working extraordinarily long hours, up to 100 hours per calendar week, as a routine exercise rather than during the "crisis time" period. Erin Hoffman, the fiancee of an EA employee, posted an "EA Spouse" weblog anonymously equally a "disgruntled spouse" in 2004, describing some of the worktime demands EA had made of her fiance, such every bit "The electric current mandatory hours are 9 a.m. to 10 p.m.—vii days a week—with the occasional Saturday evening off for good behavior (at 6:xxx PM)."[16]

Hoffman's weblog went viral and brought awareness of this "crunch civilisation" to the forefront of the industry.[xvi] Two class action lawsuits were filed against EA by employees. The first was filed originally in 2004 past video game artists looking to be compensated for unpaid overtime.[17] EA settled with the course for United states$fifteen.half dozen 1000000 by 2006. In improver to the settlement funds, EA reclassified several of the low-level developers into hourly-rate schedules to qualify for overtime in the future, but forgoing visitor stock options.[18] A second arrange was brought against EA by programmers, and was similarly settled in 2006 for US$xiv.9 million.[19] Additionally, Hoffman's weblog led a general trend across the game industry to address the thing of crunch fourth dimension, though as of 2015 it remains a significant industry issue.[16]

Since these criticisms commencement aired, it has been reported that EA has taken steps to accost work-life residue concerns by focusing on long-term projection planning, compensation, and advice with employees. These efforts accelerated with the inflow of John Riccitiello as CEO in February 2007. In December 2007, an internal EA employee survey showed a 13% increment in employee morale and a 21% increase in perception of direction recognition over a iii-year menstruum.[twenty] In May 2008, Hoffman said EA had made significant progress, but may now exist falling into quondam patterns again. She said "I think EA is tremendously reformed, having fabricated some real strong efforts to get the right people into their homo resource section", and "I've been hearing from people who have gotten overtime pay there and I recall that makes a peachy bargain of departure. In fact, I've really recommended to a few people I know to apply for jobs there", only she besides said she has begun to hear "horror stories" in one case again.[21]

The crunch civilization at EA has since been mentioned in clan with other games, with the excessive crisis having said to contribute towards the poor quality of the game. Such titles including 2006's Superman Returns which suffered from culture changes every bit EA reacted to the grade activeness lawsuits,[22] and 2019'due south Anthem.[23]

Game quality [edit]

EA'due south aggregate review performance had shown a downward tendency in quality over contempo years and was expected to bear upon market shares during competitive seasons. Pacific Crest Securities annotator Evan Wilson had said, "Poor reviews and quality are offset to tarnish the EA brand. According to our ongoing survey of GameRankings.com aggregated review data, Electronic Arts' overall game quality continues to fall... Although market place share has not declined dramatically to date, in years such as 2007, which promises to have tremendous contest, information technology seems likely if quality does not improve."[24] [25]

EA had also received criticism for developing games that lack innovation vis-à-vis the number of gaming titles produced under the EA brand that show a history of yearly updates, especially in their EA Sports franchises. These typically retail as new games at total market price and feature merely updated team rosters in addition to incremental changes to game mechanics, the user interface, soundtracks and graphics. One critique compared EA to companies similar Ubisoft and concluded that EA's innovation in new and old IPs "Crawls along at a snail's pace,"[26] while even the visitor'south ain CEO, John Riccitiello, acknowledged the lack of innovation seen in the industry generally, saying, "We're deadening people to expiry and making games that are harder and harder to play. For the nigh part, the industry has been rinse-and-repeat. In that location's been lots of product that looked similar last yr's product, that looked a lot similar the year earlier." EA has appear that it is turning its attending to creating new game IPs in order to stem this trend, with recently caused and critically acclaimed studios BioWare and Pandemic would be contributing to this process.[27] [28] In 2012, EA'south games were ranked highest of all large publishers in the manufacture, co-ordinate to Metacritic.[29]

Sports licensing and exclusivity [edit]

On June v, 2008, a lawsuit was filed in Oakland, California alleging Electronic Arts is breaking United States antitrust laws by signing exclusive contracts with the NFL Players Association, the NCAA and Arena Football game League, to utilize players' names, likenesses and team logos. This keeps other companies from being able to sign the same agreements. The suit further accuses EA of raising the price of games associated with these licenses as a result of this activity.[30] In an interview with GameTap, Peter Moore said it was the NFL that sought the deal. "To be clear, the NFL was the entity that wanted the exclusive relationship. EA bid, as did a number of other companies, for the exclusive relationship", Moore said. "It wasn't on our behest that this went sectional... We bid and we were very fortunate and lucky and delighted to be the winning licensee."[31] While EA argued the player's likenesses was incidentally used, this was rejected by the United States Courts of Appeals in 2015.[32] A farther appeal to the Us Supreme Court was unsuccessful.[33] In June 2016, EA settled with Jim Brown for $600,000.[34]

On September 26, 2013, EA settled a series of broad-ranging class activeness lawsuits filed past former NCAA players accusing EA and others of unauthorized apply of thespian likenesses in their football game and basketball games. EA settled the lawsuit for an undisclosed corporeality.[35] [36] The settlement is reported to exist effectually $40 million, to be paid to betwixt 200,000 and 300,000 players.[37]

Consumerist rating equally "Worst Company in America" [edit]

In April 2012, Consumerist awarded EA with the title of "Worst Company in America" along with a ceremonial Golden Poo trophy.[38] The record-breaking poll drew in more than 250,000 votes and saw EA chirapsia out such regulars as AT&T and Walmart. The final round of voting pitted EA confronting Bank of America. EA won with fifty,575 votes or 64.03%.[39] This consequence came in the aftermath of the Mass Effect three ending controversy which several commentators viewed every bit a significant contribution to EA's win in the poll.[39] [40] Other explanations include use of mean solar day-one DLC and EA's addiction of acquiring smaller developers to squash contest.[41] EA spokesman John Reseburg responded to the poll by saying, "We're sure that depository financial institution presidents, oil, tobacco and weapons companies are all relieved they weren't on the list this year. We're going to continue making award-winning games and services played by more than 300 meg people worldwide."[42]

In Apr 2013, EA won Consumerist 'south poll for "Worst Company in America" a 2d time, consecutively, becoming the first company to exercise so. Games mentioned in the declaration included the critically controversial Mass Effect 3 for its ending, Dead Space iii for its use of microtransactions, and the more than recent SimCity reboot due to its poorly handled launch. Additionally, poor customer support, "nickel and diming", and public dismissiveness of criticisms were also given every bit explanations for the results of the poll. Consumerist summarized the results by asking, "When we live in an era marked by massive oil spills, faulty foreclosures by bad banks, and rampant consolidation in the airline and telecom industry, what does it say about EA's business practices that and so many people have—for the second year in a row—come out to hand it the title of Worst Company in America?"[43]

When asked nearly the poll by VentureBeat, Frank Gibeau, President of EA Labels, responded "we take it seriously, and desire to see it change. In the last few months, nosotros accept started making changes to the business concern practices that gamers clearly do not like."[44] Gibeau attributes the elimination of online passes, the conclusion to make The Sims iv a single-actor, offline experience, as well as the unveiling of more than new games to the shift in thinking. "The bespeak is we are listening, and we are changing," Gibeau said.[44]

Boodle boxes [edit]

A loot box is a blazon of microtransaction in video games, in which players can apply in-game rewards or real-world funds to gain a virtual box filled with in-game items, the effects of which can vary. I approach used when creating loot boxes is to limit the system to but provide items that practice not alter gameplay, such as visual customization options for characters. In contrast, some other arroyo sees loot boxes dispense items that do change gameplay. The latter style has drawn criticism from gamers and the wider public.[45]

Loot boxes had gained popularity from developers and publishers effectually 2017, and Electronic Arts had included loot boxes or their equivalents in its games, such as FIFA 18 in its "FIFA Ultimate Team Way", Mass Issue Andromeda, and Star Wars Battlefront II. EA's initial arroyo to loot boxes during Battlefront 2 's open beta period involved pay-to-win elements, with boxes containing powerful unlockable characters that otherwise would require hours of play to learn through in game funds, in-game boosts only available through boodle boxes, and other effects.[46] [47] [48] Players complained most the pay-to-win aspects, leading EA to modify what the Battlefront Ii loot boxes independent, including assuring all items could otherwise be earned through in-game means.[49] [50] The changes withal allowed players that spent money on loot boxes to gain game-affecting elements at a faster rate than those trying to earn them in-game, leading to further criticism. Just prior to the game'south total release in Nov 2017, Disney, which owns the Star Wars intellectual property, warned EA to disable the game's boodle boxes until they could devise a not-pay-to-win system, fearing the boodle box organisation could be seen as encouraging players, including children, into gambling.[51]

In response to players who were angered by the way in which the Battlefront II progression system was fix, EA issued a statement on Reddit which stated, "The intent is to provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment for unlocking unlike heroes. We selected initial values based upon data from the Open up Beta and other adjustments made to milestone rewards earlier launch. Among other things, we're looking at average per-player credit earn rates on a daily basis, and we'll be making constant adjustments to ensure that players have challenges that are compelling, rewarding, and of form attainable via game play."[52] This currently remains the nigh downward-voted comment on Reddit.[53] A 24-hour interval later the post on Reddit was made, a Twitter user, who claimed to be a developer at Electronic Arts, had reportedly received over ane,600 death threats due to Battlefront II, and the story was picked up by CNBC.[54] Nonetheless, the user'due south story was called into question later on Jason Schreier, a pb writer at Kotaku, reached out to BiggSean66, the user who made the claims. After Schreier sent multiple messages and received no response from the user, BiggSean66 locked their Twitter account and removed any reference to being a developer from their Twitter bio.[55] EA somewhen reactivated the loot box system without any pay-to-win elements past March 2018, only the negative attention the game had drawn has impacted EA's financials.[56] Blake Jorgensen stated that they missed Battlefront II 'south targeted sales by 10% due to the loot box controversy, and had missed their financial targets for the fiscal quarter after release due to the loot box organization being offline for several months.[57]

While Battlefront II was non the only game criticized for questionable boodle box systems at this fourth dimension, the attention it drew led several governments to evaluate the nature of loot box systems as potential gambling mechanisms. Much attending was drawn to EA'due south FIFA games and their Ultimate Team Mode. Both Belgium[58] and the Netherlands[59] issued rulings that loot boxes may be considered unregulated gambling and instructed developers and publishers of games they found out of compliance (including FIFA) to accept cosmetic actions. In the case of Belgium, EA contested the ruling, asserting that the FIFA system was not in violation of gambling regulations, but eventually by January 2019 disabled the power for Belgian players to buy loot boxes in FIFA games to bring the game into compliance.[60] In the Great britain, EA defended its use of boodle boxes, comparison them to "surprise mechanics", akin to the collectible toys institute in Kinder Surprise eggs, a statement criticized by the gaming press as downplaying the boodle box issue.[61]

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c Stebbins, Samuel; Comen, Evan; Sauter, Michael B.; Stockdale, Charles (February 1, 2018). "Bad reputation: America'due south Top twenty well-nigh-hated companies". USA Today. Archived from the original on December xxx, 2019. Retrieved January nineteen, 2020.
  2. ^ Tolito, Stephan (June 21, 2010). "The Unexpected Gamer Who Runs EA". Kotaku. Archived from the original on Baronial v, 2020. Retrieved Jan 19, 2020.
  3. ^ Massey, Dana (Oct 11, 2005). ""The Conquest of Origin", page 2". Escapistmagazine.com. Archived from the original on February 12, 2009. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  4. ^ "Many believe Ultima Nine was unfairly maligned because of rushed evolution schedule". Pc.gamespy.com. May 7, 2004. Archived from the original on February 11, 2009. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  5. ^ a b Fennimore, Jack (June 10, 2018). "Studios EA Has Killed: A History". Heavy.com. Archived from the original on March v, 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2020.
  6. ^ Schreier, Jason. "An Updated List Of Studios EA Has Bought And then Shut Down". Kotaku. Archived from the original on 2019-08-03. Retrieved 2019-08-03 .
  7. ^ Kohler, Chris (Feb 8, 2008). "EA's CEO: How I Learned To Acquire Developers And Not *** Them Up". Web log.wired.com. Archived from the original on April 3, 2009. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  8. ^ Sinclair, Brendan (December 2, 2014). "EA not looking for big acquisitions". GamesIndustry.biz. Archived from the original on April xi, 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2020.
  9. ^ a b Thorsen, Tor (July xv, 2008). "E3 2008: Video Q&A: Carmack on 'one-game' id-EA deal". GameSpot. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on Baronial 15, 2011. Retrieved Oct 22, 2016.
  10. ^ Schreier, Jason (March 20, 2014). "One Explanation Backside EA 'Destroying' Bullfrog". Kotaku. Archived from the original on Oct 1, 2017. Retrieved January xix, 2020.
  11. ^ "EA shuts downwardly the studio behind 'Dead Space'". Engadget. Archived from the original on 2019-07-07. Retrieved 2019-08-03 .
  12. ^ "Electronic Arts buys stake in Ubisoft in "hostile" deed". Gamespot. Archived from the original on January 17, 2016.
  13. ^ Miller, Ross (May 29, 2007). "Ubisoft president 'still considering' EA acquisition". Joystiq. Archived from the original on February 11, 2009. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  14. ^ Makuch, Eddie (July 16, 2010). "Electronic Arts sells its pale in Ubisoft". GameSpot. Archived from the original on July 6, 2017. Retrieved July 16, 2010.
  15. ^ "Electronic Arts Sells 15% Pale In French republic's Ubisoft". The Glass Garden. July xvi, 2010. Archived from the original on March 27, 2017. Retrieved July 16, 2010.
  16. ^ a b c d Williams, Ian (February 18, 2015). "Crunched: has the games industry really stopped exploiting its workforce?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June v, 2020. Retrieved January 20, 2020.
  17. ^ Feldman, Curt (November 11, 2004). "Employees readying class-action lawsuit against EA". Gamespot.com. Archived from the original on November 13, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  18. ^ Surette, Tim (April 26, 2006). "EA settles OT dispute, disgruntled "spouse" outed". GameSpot. Archived from the original on Feb 26, 2020. Retrieved January 20, 2020.
  19. ^ "Programmers Win EA Overtime Settlement, EA_Spouse Revealed". Gamasutra.com. Archived from the original on Apr 29, 2009. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  20. ^ "'Big corporation' does a turnaround". Archived from the original on February 27, 2018. Retrieved August 29, 2012.
  21. ^ "'EA_Spouse' Hoffman: Quality Of Life Yet Event, Despite EA Improvement". Gamasutra.com. May 13, 2008. Archived from the original on Apr 15, 2009. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  22. ^ Paprocki, Matt (Feb 27, 2018). "EA Spouse, 14 Years Later: How One Person Tried Correcting EA Civilization". Glixel. Archived from the original on Feb 27, 2018.
  23. ^ Conduit, Jessica (Apr 4, 2019). "'Anthem' is proof that crisis tin can't save AAA games". Engadget. Archived from the original on October 7, 2019. Retrieved Jan 20, 2020.
  24. ^ Sinclair, Brendan (November 30, 2006). "Annotator: EA brand tarnished". GameSpot. Archived from the original on October 18, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  25. ^ Reimer, Jeremy (December 1, 2006). "EA brand "tarnished" according to annotator". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on Oct 20, 2012. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  26. ^ Fahey, Rob (August ten, 2007). "EA innovation crawls along at "snail's pace"". GamesIndustry.biz. Archived from the original on January 22, 2008. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  27. ^ Martin, Matt (2007). "EA CEO John Riccitiello: More innovation is needed in videogames". GamesIndustry.biz. Archived from the original on January 22, 2008. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
  28. ^ Elliott, Phil (January 7, 2008). "BioWare/Pandemic bargain goes through". GamesIndustry.biz. Archived from the original on September 21, 2012. Retrieved August 29, 2012.
  29. ^ Dietz, Jason (February 5, 2013). "Metacritic's 3rd Almanac Game Publisher Rankings". Metacritic. Archived from the original on May 8, 2013.
  30. ^ "Antitrust lawsuit over exclusive license contracts" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 10, 2011. Retrieved May 31, 2011.
  31. ^ Kuchera, Ben (June 12, 2008). "Lawsuit flags EA for illegal procedure on football monopoly". Arstechnica. Archived from the original on October one, 2008. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  32. ^ Kravets, David (January 6, 2015). "NFL players win appeals court ruling in EA Madden NFL flap". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on July 10, 2016. Retrieved June 28, 2016.
  33. ^ Kravets, David (March 21, 2016). "Supreme Court punts in 1st Amendment Madden NFL legal fight". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on July 7, 2016. Retrieved June 28, 2016.
  34. ^ Kravets, David (June 28, 2016). "EA punts, gives $600k to one-time football game star in Madden NFL rights flap". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on June 28, 2016. Retrieved June 28, 2016.
  35. ^ "EA Sports settles suits, thousands of players eligible for money". Archived from the original on September 27, 2013.
  36. ^ Eder, Steve (September 26, 2013). "E.A. Sports Settles Lawsuit With College Athletes". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 19, 2017.
  37. ^ Rovell, Darren (September 28, 2013). "Players to receive $40 million". ESPN. Archived from the original on July 21, 2016. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  38. ^ Morran, Chris (April iv, 2012). "The Voters Have Spoken: EA Is Your Worst Company In America For 2012!". Consumerist. Archived from the original on August vii, 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  39. ^ a b Gaudiosi, John (Apr 7, 2012). "Electronic Arts Named Worst Company in America". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on May 11, 2012.
  40. ^ Matyszczyk, Chris (April 8, 2012). "EA, named America's worst visitor, tries to make amends". CNET. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on Feb 21, 2014. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  41. ^ Hsu, Tiffany (April 4, 2012). "Electronic Arts: 'Worst company in America'? Consumerist says aye". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on October 27, 2012.
  42. ^ Brightman, James (April 4, 2012). "EA responds to "worst visitor" label from Consumerist". gamesindustry.biz. Archived from the original on October 24, 2013. Retrieved July 9, 2013.
  43. ^ Morran, Chris (April 9, 2013). "EA Makes Worst Company In America History, Wins Title For 2nd Year In A Row!". Consumerist. Archived from the original on Nov nine, 2016. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  44. ^ a b Takahashi, Dean (23 July 2013). "EA exec Frank Gibeau: Betting on side by side-gen consoles, mobile, and doing right by consumers (interview)". VentureBeat. Archived from the original on July 28, 2013.
  45. ^ Andrew East. Freedman 09 Baronial 2019 (9 August 2019). "What Are Boodle Boxes? Gaming's Big New Trouble, Explained". Tom's Guide. Archived from the original on 2020-10-xv. Retrieved 2020-ten-14 .
  46. ^ Dingman, Hayden (Oct ten, 2017). "How boodle boxes are turning full-priced PC games into pay-to-win games of adventure". PC Earth. Archived from the original on February 7, 2018. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
  47. ^ Purchase, Robert (Oct 9, 2017). "Star Wars Battlefront ii has a loot crate problem". Eurogamer. Archived from the original on Oct 10, 2017. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
  48. ^ Fahey, Rob (October 13, 2017). "Thinking exterior the loot box". GamesIndustry.biz. Archived from the original on Oct 13, 2017. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  49. ^ O'Conner, James (Oct 13, 2017). "Afterwards beta controversy, DICE has ameliorate clarified the 'loot crate' and progression systems in Star Wars Battlefront 2". VG247. Archived from the original on October 13, 2017. Retrieved October xiii, 2017.
  50. ^ Mackovech, Sam (October 31, 2017). "Star Wars: Battlefront Two changes its loot box plans... simply is it enough?". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on Nov xviii, 2017. Retrieved Nov 17, 2017.
  51. ^ Needleman, Sarah; Fritz, Ben (November 17, 2017). "Electronic Arts Pulls Microtransactions From 'Star Wars Battlefront 2' After Fan Backlash". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on November 17, 2017. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
  52. ^ "r/StarWarsBattlefront - Comment by u/EACommunityTeam on "Seriously? I paid eighty$ to have Vader locked?"". reddit. Archived from the original on 2020-04-01. Retrieved 2020-03-30 .
  53. ^ "downvoted - ListOfComments". reddit. Archived from the original on 2020-05-17. Retrieved 2020-03-30 .
  54. ^ Salinas, Sara (2017-11-thirteen). "EA's new 'Star Wars' game is and then unpopular a programmer is apparently getting death threats". CNBC. Archived from the original on 2017-11-13. Retrieved 2020-03-30 .
  55. ^ "A Guide To The Endless, Disruptive Star Wars Battlefront Ii Controversy". Kotaku. Archived from the original on 2020-04-05. Retrieved 2020-03-30 .
  56. ^ Crecente, Brian (March 16, 2018). "'Star Wars Battlefront 2' Boodle Box Overhaul Detailed". Glixel. Archived from the original on March sixteen, 2018. Retrieved March 16, 2018.
  57. ^ Sarkar, Samit (January 30, 2018). "Star Wars Battlefront 2 sales miss targets, EA blames loot crate controversy". Polygon. Archived from the original on January 31, 2018. Retrieved Jan xxx, 2018.
  58. ^ Yin-Poole, Wesley (April 25, 2018). "Now Belgium declares loot boxes gambling and therefore illegal". Eurogamer. Archived from the original on December three, 2018. Retrieved April 25, 2018.
  59. ^ Taylor, Haydn (April 19, 2018). "Loot boxes in leading games violate Dutch gambling legislation". GamesIndustry.biz . Retrieved Apr 19, 2018.
  60. ^ O'Conner, Alice (January 29, 2019). "FIFA Ultimate Team to finer stop selling boodle boxes in Belgium". Stone Paper Shotgun. Archived from the original on January 29, 2019. Retrieved Jan 29, 2019.
  61. ^ Bailey, Dustin (June 19, 2019). "EA: They're non loot boxes, they're "surprise mechanics," and they're "quite upstanding"". PCGamesN. Archived from the original on June xix, 2019. Retrieved June 19, 2019.

armstrongsularoat.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Electronic_Arts

0 Response to "Electronic Arts Need to Go Out if Business for Their Shady Loot Box Scams"

Enregistrer un commentaire

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel